SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13624

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
ANIYAS K A – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 6776 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.BIJITH S.KHAN, SHRI.RAJESH O.N., SHRI.AMEER SALIM, SHRI.ROY ANTONY, SHRI.SADIQ NAZAR
For the Respondents: None

The court mandated timely processing of applications under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act.

Headnote:The court examined the petition regarding the Form 6 application filed under Section 27A read with Rule 12(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act and Rules, 2008. The petitioners seek a directive for timely consideration of their application. The court ordered the 3rd respondent to evaluate and decide on the application as per the prescribed timeline. The outcome is a mandamus for expeditious proceedings.

Table of Content
1. writ petition filed for timely processing of form 6 application. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments heard on both sides regarding the application. (Para 3)
3. court directed specific timelines for processing. (Para 4)

JUDGMENT

The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:

" i. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ order or direction to the 3rd respondent to consider and pass orders on Form 6 application filed by the petitioners having application no. 1/2025/77439 within the time this Hon’ble Court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case.

ii. Declare that the application in Form 6 having application no. 1/2025/77439 is liable to be disposed of without any delay.

iii. Command the 3rd respondent to order change of status of the land covered by Exhibit P1, as applied in Form 6 application by the petitioners, within two weeks.

iv. Exempt the petitioner from producing the English Translation of Malayalam Exhibits produced along with this writ petition and the petitioner further undertakes that they are ready and willing to produce English Translation of Malayalam documents as and when required.

v. Issue any other writ order or direction as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case. "

[SIC]

2. The main prayer in this Writ Petition is to consider Ext.P3 Form - 6 application filed by the petitioner under Section 27A read with Rule 12(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act and Rules, 2008 ('Act and Rules' in short).

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.

4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P3 within a time frame.

Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:

1. The 4th respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on the Ext.P3 application to the 3rd respondent/Authorised O period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

2. The 3rd respondent/Authorised O to consider the Ext.P3 application (if it is pending and if it is in order) based on the report received from the 4th respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the report. I make it clear that the 3rd respondent is free to pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law.

3. The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this Writ Petition with exhibits, before the 3rd and 4th respondents for compliance.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top