SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13625

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
TRATUM TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD – Appellant
Versus
THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR (LA) – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 6793 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.RANJIT BABU
For the Respondents: SR GP SMT VIDYA KURIAKOSE

Court mandates timely processing of applications by authorities in land use cases.

Headnote:This Writ Petition

(C) seeks a mandamus for the timely processing of Ext. P3 application related to land use. The Court found merit in directing a report submission and subsequent consideration. The issues framed include the necessity for timely action by authorities. The Court concluded by mandating specific timelines for compliance with the petitioner's application.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks timely adjudication of application. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court agrees to issue directions for consideration. (Para 3)
3. court mandates report submission and application consideration within specified periods. (Para 4)

JUDGMENT

The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:

"i. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction to 1st respondent/authority concerned to consider and pass order on Ext.P3 application within a time frame fixed by this Hon'ble Court.

ii. Issue a writ of mandamus or other writ, order or direction to the 4th respondent to submit a report to the 1st respondent/ authority concerned within a time frame fixed by the Hon’ble Court.

iii. Dispense with filing of the translation of vernacular documents.

iv. Issue such other writ, order or direction as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case."

[SIC]

2. When this Writ Petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext.

P3 Form – 5 application within a time frame.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.

4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P3 application within a time frame.

Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:

1. The 4th respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on the Ext. P3 application to the 1st respondent/Authorised Officer, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

2. The 1st respondent/Authorised O to consider Ext. P3 application (if it is pending and if it is in order) based on the report received from the 4th respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of the report.

3. The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this Writ Petition with exhibits, before the 1st and 4th respondents for compliance.

Sd/-

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE GBG

Judgment reserved NA
Date of Judgment 23.02.2026
Judgment dictated 23.02.2026
Draft Judgment placed 24.02.2026
Final Judgment uploaded 25.02.2026
PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT BEARING NO.

KL07041705473/2023 DATED 21.05.2023 Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT EXTRACT OF THE PUBLISHED DATA BANK OF NEDUMBASSERY GRAMA PANCHAYATH BEARING NO.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top