The Court emphasized the necessity for timely administrative review of petitions regarding educational administration.

JUDGMENT

The above writ petition is filed with following prayers :

i. “Issue a writ of mandamus directing the 2nd respondent Director of General Education to consider and dispose the Ext.P13 appeal and P13(a) stay petition filed by the petitioner with in a time frame as fixed by this Hon’ble Court;

ii. issue a writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent Secretary to Government to consider and dispose the Ext.17 Revision filed by the petitioner against the reprimand made against her in Ext.P14 with in a time frame as fixed by this Hon’ble Court;

iii. Grant such other and further reliefs as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper.

iv. to dispense with filing of English translation of vernacular documents produced along with the Writ Petition.” [sic]

2. The only prayer in this writ petition is to consider Ext.P13 appeal and Ext.P13(a) stay petition by the

2^nd respondent and Ext.P17 revision by the 1^st respondent.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.

4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider the appeal and revision within a time frame.

Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of with the following directions :

1) The 2^nd respondent is directed to consider Exts.P13 and P13(a), after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.