SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13628

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
NINU THUSHARA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 6858 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.S.SUBHASH CHAND
For the Respondents: GP SRI VENUGOPAL V

Timely action on representations concerning service approval is essential for effective public administration.

Headnote:This writ petition seeks a mandamus directing the approval of appointment from 19.09.2008 to 31.05.2009 within a specified timeframe concerning the petitioner's service. The Court recognized the lack of implementation of Ext.P13 and mandated the first respondent to act swiftly based on Ext.P15 representation. Key issues included whether timely orders on representations were necessary for effective administration. The Court allowed the writ petition with clear directives for compliance within one month from the date of receiving this judgment.

Table of Content
1. petition filed for service appointment approval. (Para 1 , 2)

JUDGMENT

The above writ petition is filed with following prayers :

i) “To issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order directing respondent No. 4 to grant approval of appointment to the petitioner from 19.09.2008 to 31.05.2009 in the additional division vacancy as High School Teacher (Physical Science) as granted to similarly situated teachers by Exts. P4 to P9, P10 and P10(a) judgments passed by this Hon’ble Court, by implementation of Exhibit-P13 Government Order within such time as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice;

ii) To issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order directing respondent No. 1 to consider and pass final orders on Ext.P15 representation with notice and opportunity of hearing to the petitioner within such time as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice;

iii) To mould and grant such other reliefs, as this Hon’ble Court shall deem just and proper in the interest of justice, including costs.

iv) Dispense with the production of English translation of documents in vernacular language.” [sic]

2. According to the petitioner, Ext.P13 order is there in favour of the petitioner and the same is not implemented and hence, the petitioner submitted Ext.P15 before the 1st respondent. The prayer in this writ petition is to consider Ext.P15 within a time frame.

3. Heard the learned Government Pleader also.

4. I think that prayer can be allowed.

Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of with the following directions :

1) The 1st respondent is directed to consider Ext.P15 and pass appropriate orders in the light of Ext.P13 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

2) The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition with exhibits before the 1st respondent for compliance.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top