IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. JAYACHANDRAN, J
SASIDHARAN NADAR M – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Exts.P1 to P29 are awards passed in respect of the various extents of land belonging to the petitioners, who are 16 in number. The petitioners preferred Arbitration Applications before the 5th respondent/District Collector. The same are pending with him for the past about ten years, is the grievance.
2. Having heard learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners, learned Government Pleader for respondents 3 to 6, and learned counsel for respondents 1 and 2, this Court is of the opinion that this Writ Petition can be disposed of with a direction to the 5th respondent to consider and pass orders in the respective Arbitration Applications preferred by the petitioners, challenging Exts.P1 to P29 Awards, in accordance with law, expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioners will produce a copy of this judgment before the 5th respondent, for compliance. Needless to say that the petitioners, as also, any other affected party shall be afforded an opportunity of being heard, before taking a call in the respective applications preferred by the petitioners. In view of the pendency of the applications for th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.