SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13640

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. JAYACHANDRAN, J
SHINIL VAS P.V – Appellant
Versus
THE VILLAGE OFFICER NAYARAMBALAM – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 43788 OF 2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.K.S.MADHUSOODANAN, SRI.M.M.VINOD KUMAR, SRI.P.K.RAKESH KUMAR, SRI.K.S.MIZVER, SHRI.M.J.KIRANKUMAR
For the Respondents: SRI.SABU GEORGE, SRI.P.B.SUBRAMANYAN, SRI.MANU VYASAN PETER

The court upheld the entitlement to property registry transfer when no objections are present from concerned parties.

Headnote:Statute Analysis: The judgment addresses the procedure for transfer of property registry as per relevant land tribunal orders. Facts: The petitioners sought the transfer of registry concerning their ancestral property as directed by the Land Tribunal, with no objections from the respondents.

Findings of Court:
The court directed the Tahsildar to effect the transfer within three weeks if petitioners are entitled.

Issues: The court examined whether the petitioners were entitled to the transfer and the process required for compliance.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that valid reasons exist for the transfer as there were no objections by the interested party.

Result: The court directed the Tahsildar to effect transfer within three weeks.

Table of Content
1. application for property registry transfer based on tribunal order. (Para 1)
2. no objections from respondents concerning the transfer. (Para 2)
3. court directs transfer by the tahsildar. (Para 3)

JUDGMENT Ext.P4 is an application for transfer of registry in respect of the property covered by Ext.P3 Order of the Land Tribunal.

An Appeal carried by the 2nd respondent was also dismissed.

2. Learned counsel for the 2nd respondent would submit that there is no objection, whatsoever, in effecting transfer of registry in favour of the petitioners.

3. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Government Pleader and also the learned counsel for the 2nd respondent, this Court directs the Tahsildar, Kochi Taluk to effect transfer of registry in favour of the petitioners, provided the petitioners is entitled for the same, otherwise. The above exercise shall be completed within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioners will produce a copy of this judgment before the Tahsildar (L.R.) concerned. To ensure compliance of this Order, “Tahsildar (L.R.), Taluk Office, Ground Floor, K.B.Jacob Road, Fort Kochi,” is suo motu impleaded as additional 3rd respondent, on whose behalf the learned Government Pleader takes notice.

This Writ Petition will stand disposed of as above.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top