SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13673

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
P.H.SULIKHA – Appellant
Versus
CORPORATION OF KOCHI – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.M.A.VAHEEDA BABU, SRI.BABU KARUKAPADATH, SRI.P.K.ABDUL RAHIMAN, SMT.ARYA RAGHUNATH, SHRI.KARUKAPADATH WAZIM BABU, SMT.P.LAKSHMI, SMT.AYSHA E.M., SHRI.MANU KRISHNA S.K., SHRI.HASHIM K.M., SHRI.ABUASIL A.K., SMT.HANIYA NAFIZA V.S.
For the Respondents: SHRI.D.G.VIPIN, SC – KOCHI CORPORATION, SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS, SC

JUDGMENT

When this writ petition came up for consideration on 18.02.2026, there was no representation for the petitioner. Today also, there is no representation. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Corporation submitted that his information is that the matter is settled.

If that be the case, this writ petition can be closed.

Therefore, this Writ Petition is closed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top