Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13674

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Sathish Ninan, P.Krishna Kumar, JJ
ILLIYAS , S/O.SAIDALAVI AGED 36 YEARS, KALTHAKKATTUTHODI HOUSE, POOPPALAM, VALAMBUR P.O., PERINTHALMANNA TALUK. – Appellant
Versus
UMAIVA AGED 33 YEARS D/O ABDURAHIMAN, AGED 33 YEARS, MANCHERI HOUSE, ERAVIMANGALAM P.O., PERINTALMANNA TALUK, PERINTALMANNA. – Respondent
MAT.APPEAL NO. 1117 OF 2016

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.LAL K.JOSEPH, SRI.V.S.SHIRAZ BAVA
For the Respondents: SHRI.J.VIMAL

The court upheld the dismissal of a matrimonial appeal based on the parties' out-of-court settlement, confirming the resolution of disputes.

Headnote:The Court considered a matrimonial appeal where the parties settled their disputes out of court. The primary determination of the Court was the dismissal of the appeal as not prosecuted, reflecting the resolution of the matter outside formal proceedings.

Sathish Ninan, J.

The learned counsel for the appellants submits that, the parties have settled their disputes out of court and the appeal is not prosecuted. The same is recorded.

Accordingly, the Matrimonial Appeal is dismissed.

Sathish Ninan, Judge P.Krishna Kumar, Judge rsr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :