SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13675

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Sathish Ninan, P. Krishna Kumar, JJ
SHERLY ABRAHAM – Appellant
Versus
ALIYAMMA KUIAKOSE @ MOLLY – Respondent
RFA NO. 64 OF 2017



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: V.V. Surendran, P.A. Harish
For the Respondents: Rajeev V. Kurup

Dismissing an appeal as not pressed does not affect the substantive rights of the parties involved.

Headnote:The Regular First Appeal was brought under specific provisions but was ultimately dismissed by the court as not pressed, implying no determination on the merits of the case. The court's findings indicate a procedural outcome without prejudice to any rights. The dismissal serves as a reminder of the appellant's choice during litigation.

Sathish Ninan, J.

Memo recorded.

Regular First Appeal is dismissed as not pressed.

Sathish Ninan, Judge P.Krishna Kumar, Judge rsr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top