SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13676

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Sathish Ninan, P.Krishna Kumar, JJ
JOY AGED 65 YEARS S/O.MAMBRAKARAN KOCHUDEVASSY – Appellant
Versus
THOMAN S/O.POULOSE – Respondent
RP NO. 1142 OF 2015 | RFA NO.425 OF 2012



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.M.A.AUGUSTINE, SRI.P.MURALEEDHARAN

A review petition can be dismissed for non-prosecution if the appellant fails to appear despite multiple adjournments.

Headnote:The Review Petition was brought before the High Court under RP No. 1142 of 2015 concerning an earlier decision on RFA No. 425 of 2012. The Court dismissed the petition due to the absence of representation on multiple occasions, reaffirming its procedure for adjudication when the appellant fails to appear, reflecting adherence to principles of prosecution.

Sathish Ninan, J.

When the review petition was listed on 17/02/2026, there was no representation for the review petitioner- appellant. Accordingly, it was adjourned to 19/02/2026. On the said day also, there was no it was adjourned to this day.

2. Today also, when the matter is called there absent.

Hence, the review petition is dismissed for non-

prosecution.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top