SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13676

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Sathish Ninan, P.Krishna Kumar, JJ
JOY AGED 65 YEARS S/O.MAMBRAKARAN KOCHUDEVASSY – Appellant
Versus
THOMAN S/O.POULOSE – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.M.A.AUGUSTINE, SRI.P.MURALEEDHARAN

Sathish Ninan, J.

When the review petition was listed on 17/02/2026, there was no representation for the review petitioner- appellant. Accordingly, it was adjourned to 19/02/2026. On the said day also, there was no it was adjourned to this day.

2. Today also, when the matter is called there absent.

Hence, the review petition is dismissed for non-

prosecution.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top