SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13689

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
V. HARILAL – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE TAX OFFICER, SQUAD NO. III, SGST DEPARTMENT, KARUNAGAPPALLY AT KOLLAM – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 6288 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.V.DEVANANDA NARASIMHAM, SMT.SHEEJA D.K.
For the Respondents: SHRI. ARUN AJAY SHANKAR

Withdrawal of a writ petition does not bar a party from approaching the court again on the same cause of action.

Headnote:In the writ petition WP

(C) No. 6288 of 2026, the petitioner sought to withdraw the writ without prejudice to his rights for future action on the same grounds. The Court granted this permission, allowing the dismissal of the case as withdrawn. The resolution highlights the procedural aspect allowing a party to retain the right to contest later despite withdrawal.

JUDGMENT

Today when the matter came up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition without prejudice to the right of the petitioner, to approach this Court again on the very same cause of action.

Permission granted and accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, subject to the above right.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top