SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13765

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
ANAS C A – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 1067 OF 2026 | CRIME NO.71/2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.VISHNU CHANDRAN, SHRI.AMALA PURUSHOTHAMAN, SHRI.MUHAMMED NIYAS K.H.
For the Respondents: SRI.K.A. NOUSXHAD

Bail granted based on lack of evidence connecting the accused to the crime and the status of the investigation.

Headnote:This judgment arises from a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, concerning accused No. 1 in Crime No. 71/2026. The prosecution alleged possession of narcotics during a police search. The court determined that the applicant was entitled to bail following a thorough review of the case and conditions justified by lack of prior criminal history and status of the investigation being nearly complete. Issues framed included the applicant’s innocence and lack of connection to the alleged crime. The court concluded that the applicant is to be released on bail with specified conditions.

Table of Content
1. circumstances of the search and seizure of narcotics detail. (Para 2)
2. arguments presented by counsel regarding bail entitlement. (Para 4 , 5)

ORDER

This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short, BNSS ), seeking regular bail.

2. The applicant is the accused No.1 in Crime No.71/2026 of Kalamassery Police Station, Ernakulam District. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 20 (b)(ii)(A), 22(b) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act , 1985.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on

24.01.2026, the DANSAF team conducted a search at Hotel Baith at Thrikkakara and found 2.2 grams of MDMA and 0.84 grams of ganja from the possession of the applicant and thereby committed the offences.

4. I have heard Sri.Vishnu Chandran, the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri.K.A.Noushad, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, he is entitled to bail. On the other hand, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicant, and he is not entitled to bail at this stage.

6. The applicant was remanded to judicial custody on

24.01.2026. The investigation is almost over. The recovery has been effected. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. For these reasons, I do not find any reason to hold that the continued detention of the applicant is required for any purpose. Hence, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions: -

(i) The applicant shall be released on bail on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Magistrate/Court.

(ii) The applicant shall fully co-operate with the investigation.

(iii) The applicant shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m and 11.00 a.m. every Saturday until further orders. He shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required.

(iv) The applicant shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.

(v) The applicant shall not attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation. (vi) The applicant shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.

(vii) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of the bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top