SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13767

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
MUKBUL HOSSAIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 1071 OF 2026 | CRIME NO.7/2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Smt.Yesma D. Elavanthara, Smt.Shyma K.P.
For the Respondents: Sri.M.C. Ashi

The court established that continued detention without evidence is unjust, granting bail under specific conditions.

Headnote:This application was filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking regular bail for the applicants accused of possession of narcotic substances. The court found the applicants had been remanded without evidence to justify continued detention. The prosecution's argument was that the applicants were intentionally involved in criminal acts. The bail was granted under specified conditions to ensure cooperation and prevent tampering with evidence.

Table of Content
1. details of the alleged crime (Para 2)
2. court's determination on bail conditions (Para 4 , 6)
3. arguments regarding innocence and evidence (Para 5)

O R D E R

This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, BNSS )

seeking regular bail.

2. The applicants are the accused Nos.1 to 3 in Crime No.7/2026 of Palakkad Excise Range Office, Palakkad District. The offence alleged is punishable under Section 20 (b)(ii)(B) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 .

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on

14.01.2026 at 03:30 pm, on Coimbatore - Palakkad NH -544 in front of Walayar Excise Check post, the applicants were found in possession of 12 kilograms of ganja while they were travelling in a KSRTC bus bearing Registration No. 15-A-1795, which was plying from Coimbatore to Cherthala and thereby committed the offence.

4. I have heard Smt.Yesma D. Elavanthara, the learned counsel for the applicants and Sri.M.C.Ashi, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicants submitted that the applicants are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicants with the alleged crime; hence, they are entitled to bail. On the other hand, the learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicants, and they are not entitled to bail at this stage.

6. The applicants were remanded to judicial custody on 14.01.2026. The investigation is almost over and the recovery has been effected. The applicants have no criminal antecedents. For these reasons, I do not find any reason to hold that the continued detention of the applicants is required for any purpose. Hence, the applicants are entitled to be released on bail.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions: -

(i) The applicants shall be released on bail on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) each with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Magistrate/Court.

(ii) The sureties shall be from the State of Kerala.

(iii) The applicants shall fully co-operate with the investigation.

(iv) The applicants shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m and 11.00 a.m every Saturday until further orders. They shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required.

(v) The applicants shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.

(vi) The applicants shall not attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.

(vii) The applicants shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.

(viii) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of the bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court.

Sd/-

DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, JUDGE

APA

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top