SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13782

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
REGHU M.G – Appellant
Versus
THRIKKAKARA MUNICIPAL CO-OPERATIVE HOSPITAL SOCIETY LTD. NO.E-993 – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 7596 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.M.P.HARIKUMARAN PILLAI, SHRI.NARAYANAN V.B.
For the Respondents: ADV.RAJEEV JYOTHISH GEORGE, GOVERNMENT PLEADER

Jurisdictional limits dictate that grievances must be addressed through appropriate channels outside the court.

Headnote:The judgment addresses the jurisdictional limits of the court, underlining that remedies for grievances may lie elsewhere. The petitioner requested to withdraw the writ petition to file a new one, which the court permitted while dismissing the current petition. The court concluded by stating that the petition is dismissed as withdrawn verbatim.

Table of Content
1. court acknowledges jurisdictional constraints. (Para 1)
2. writ petition dismissed with permission for withdrawal. (Para 2)

JUDGMENT

In view of the nature of jurisdiction exercised by the roster allotted to this Court, I am of the view that, if the petitioner has a grievance, the remedy is elsewhere.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition, in accordance with law.

Reserving the aforesaid liberty, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top