SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13784

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
RAJESH PANICKER T. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 37450 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.JOHNSON GOMEZ, SRI.SANJAY JOHNSON, SHRI.SANJITH JOHNSON, SMT.DEEBU R., SHRI.ABIN JACOB MATHEW, SHRI.ARUN JOHNY
For the Respondents: SRI. RAJEEV JYOTHISH GEORGE, GP, SRI.H.PRAVEEN (KOTTARAKARA)

Withdrawal permission was granted, leading to dismissal of the writ petition.

Headnote:The court addressed the application from the petitioner seeking withdrawal of the writ petition under WP

(C) No. 37450 of 2025. It noted that the petitioner requested permission to withdraw the application. Consequently, the court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the petition. The key issue revolved around the acceptance of the request and the procedural aspect of withdrawal. The court concluded with an order permitting the withdrawal of the writ petition, thereby dismissing the case as withdrawn.

JUDGMENT

The learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition.

Permission granted. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

App_Store_Badge Google_Play_Store

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon Instagram Icon Twitter Icon

Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

whatsapp-icon