SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13788

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
ABHEESH HASSAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.SAJU J PANICKER, SHRI.KURIAN K JOSE
For the Respondents: SRI.M.KIRANLAL, SRI.R.RAJESH (VARKALA), SRI.MANU RAMACHANDRAN, SRI.T.S.SARATH, SHRI.SAMEER M NAIR, SHRI.V.M.VISHNU MOHAN, SHRI.GEETHU KRISHNAN, SMT.HARSHA SUSAN SAM, SR. PP. ADV. SMT. BINDU.O.V

O R D E R

(Dated this the 27th day of February, 2026)

The petitioner is absent. There is no representation for the petitioner. During the previous posting date also, there was no representation. Therefore, this Crl.MC is dismissed for non prosecution.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top