Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13788

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
ABHEESH HASSAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 2697 OF 2022

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.SAJU J PANICKER, SHRI.KURIAN K JOSE
For the Respondents: SRI.M.KIRANLAL, SRI.R.RAJESH (VARKALA), SRI.MANU RAMACHANDRAN, SRI.T.S.SARATH, SHRI.SAMEER M NAIR, SHRI.V.M.VISHNU MOHAN, SHRI.GEETHU KRISHNAN, SMT.HARSHA SUSAN SAM, SR. PP. ADV. SMT. BINDU.O.V

Non-prosecution leads to case dismissal when parties fail to appear or represent.

Headnote:The judgment pertains to a Criminal Miscellaneous Case under CRL.MC NO. 2697 OF 2022 regarding a petitioner's absence in the proceedings. The court found non-representation during previous dates and dismissed the case for non-prosecution due to lack of appearance. The outcome illustrates the procedural adherence to the need for parties to be actively engaged in court processes.

O R D E R

(Dated this the 27th day of February, 2026)

The petitioner is absent. There is no representation for the petitioner. During the previous posting date also, there was no representation. Therefore, this Crl.MC is dismissed for non prosecution.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13788

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMC. PRATHEEP KUMAR, JABHEESH HASSAN – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentCRL.MC NO. 2697 OF 2022

Non-prosecution leads to case dismissal when parties fail to appear or represent.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
ABHEESH HASSAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 2697 OF 2022