SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13789

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
GOPINATHAN., VINU VISWANTHAN@ SUSHEELAN., NISHA VINU @ HIMA. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA., STATION HOUSE OFFICER., SUCHITHRA. – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 2862 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: K.R.PRATHISH
For the Respondents: SANAL P RAJ (PP)

Dismissal of appeal due to non-representation by the petitioners is upheld.

Headnote:The court analyzed the implications of non-appearance of the petitioners in proceedings related to CRL.MC NO. 2862 OF 2025. The court noted that the absence of representation led to a lack of merit in the underlying appeal, hence affirming the dismissal. The issue framed was related to whether the petitioners' absence warranted dismissal, concluding that it did.

O R D E R

(Dated this the 27th day of February, 2026)

Today, when the matter came up for arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner is absent and there is no representation. During the previous posting date also, there was no representation for the petitioner.

Therefore, this Crl.M.C is dismissed for non prosecution.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

App_Store_Badge Google_Play_Store

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon Instagram Icon Twitter Icon

Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

whatsapp-icon