SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13790

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
JAGADEEP T.C. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA. – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.K.ABOOBACKER SIDHEEQUE
For the Respondents: SHRI.VISHNU NARAYANAN, SMT. BINDU.O.V

O R D E R

(Dated this the 27th day of February, 2026)

The petitioner who is the accused in C.C No.271 of 2024 on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Kannur, arising out of Crime No.64 of 2024 of Kannur Town Police Station, filed this Crl.M.C under Section 528 praying for quashing all the proceedings against him on the ground that the matter has been settled with the de facto complainant.

2. However, when the SHO concerned contacted the de facto complainant, she stated that she is not willing to settle the dispute. Therefore, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this Crl.M.C with liberty to challenge the final report on merits.

Permission is granted and the Crl.M.C is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the final report on merits.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top