Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
JAGADEEP T.C. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA. – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 8177 OF 2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. quashing proceedings requires consent of complainant. (Para 1) |
| 2. withdrawal of crl.m.c granted for further legal challenge. (Para 2) |
O R D E R
(Dated this the 27th day of February, 2026)
The petitioner who is the accused in C.C No.271 of 2024 on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Kannur, arising out of Crime No.64 of 2024 of Kannur Town Police Station, filed this Crl.M.C under Section 528 praying for quashing all the proceedings against him on the ground that the matter has been settled with the de facto complainant.
2. However, when the SHO concerned contacted the de facto complainant, she stated that she is not willing to settle the dispute. Therefore, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this Crl.M.C with liberty to challenge the final report on merits.
Permission is granted and the Crl.M.C is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the final report on merits.
Sd/-
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
