SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13804

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
JOSE BENCHAMIN – Appellant
Versus
PEUSE – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 5875 OF 2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.ABDUL JAWAD K., SHRI.U.MUHAMMED MUSTHAFA, SMT.A.GRANCY JOSE
For the Respondents: SRI.ANEESH JAMES, SHRI.JIJO THOMAS, SMT.M.D.BEENA

The court dismissed the application as infructuous due to the lapse of the requested time period for compliance.

Headnote:This judgment relates to Crl.M.C. No. 5875 of 2024, filed requesting six months to pay the fine imposed by the Judicial First Class Magistrate-V, Palakkad, concerning ST No.36/2018. The court determined that the time requested had lapsed and stated, 'nothing further survives in the Crl.M.C.'. The result is that the Crl.M.C. is dismissed as infructuous.

C.S.DIAS, J.

---------------------------------------------

Crl.M.C. No. 5875 OF 2024 -----------------------------------------------

Dated this the 27th day of February, 2026 ORDER The Crl.M.C is filed to grant the petitioner six months time from 07.07.2024 to pay the fine amount imposed on him by the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-V, Palakkad in ST No.36/2018.

As the time period sought for in the Crl.M.C. has already lapsed, I am of the view that nothing further survives in the Crl.M.C.. Hence, the Crl.M.C. is dismissed as infructuous.

sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top