SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13810

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
EASWARAN S., J
THETHRAVAN THARAVAD ERINHIKKAL BHAGAVATHI KSHETHRA COMMITTEE – Appellant
Versus
NEELIYATH KARUNAKARAN @ APPU – Respondent
OP(C) NO. 3266 OF 2013



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.GRASHIOUS KURIAKOSE (SR.), SRI.M.M.ANTO, SHRI.GEORGE MATHEWS

The court dismissed the petition due to the lack of instructions from the petitioner's counsel.

Headnote:This case involves OP

(C) No. 3266 of 2013 where the petitioner sought to review an order from the Munsiff Court, Payyannur. The court discussed the lack of instructions from the petitioner’s counsel, leading to the dismissal of the case. The court’s findings highlighted the absence of representation. The judgment concludes with the order of dismissal.

J U D G M E N T

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that there are no instructions from his client.

Accordingly, this original petition is dismissed.

Sd/-

EASWARAN S.

JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top