SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13832

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
GOPINATH P., J
JOSHUA P. P – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.A.K.HARIDAS
For the Respondents: SRI.V.K.PRASAD

J U D G M E N T

The learned counsel appearing for the respondent bank submits that the loan in question stands closed. Therefore, no further orders are necessary in the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top