Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13832

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
GOPINATH P., J
JOSHUA P. P – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 39927 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.A.K.HARIDAS
For the Respondents: SRI.V.K.PRASAD

Writ petition closed due to the closure of the loan in question.

Headnote:The court noted that the loan in question had been closed, rendering further orders unnecessary. The court framed the matter as a determination of whether the writ petition could proceed given the closure of the loan. Ultimately, the court concluded to close the writ petition.

J U D G M E N T

The learned counsel appearing for the respondent bank submits that the loan in question stands closed. Therefore, no further orders are necessary in the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13832

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMGOPINATH P., JJOSHUA P. P – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentWP(C) NO. 39927 OF 2025

Writ petition closed due to the closure of the loan in question.

Headnote:The court noted that the loan in question had been closed, rendering further orders unnecessary. The court framed the matter as a determination of whether the writ petition could proceed given the closure of the loan. Ultimately, the court concluded to close the writ petition.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
GOPINATH P., J
JOSHUA P. P – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 39927 OF 2025