Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
ROSY – Appellant
Versus
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 18508 OF 2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court hearings and representation (Para 1) |
| 2. review of applications regarding environmental conservation (Para 2) |
| 3. outcome directing timely administrative review (Para 3) |
J U D G M E N T
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Pleader.
2. The petitioner has approached this Court pointing out that she has filed Ext.P7 application in Form 5 and Ext.P5 application in Form 6 before the 1st respondent herein under the provisions of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act and Rules, 2008.
3. The petitioner only seeks a direction to the respondents to consider and pass orders on the aforementioned applications.
In view of the limited prayer in the writ petition as above, this writ petition would stand disposed of, directing the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Exts.P7 and P5 applications filed before him, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
Sd/-
HARISANKAR V. MENON JUDGE
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
