Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.K.C.VINCENT
For the Respondents: SMT. SYLAJA S.L.,GP

The court upheld the procedural validity of the application under land revenue laws, emphasizing the significance of compliance with statutory requirements.

Headnote:The petitioner filed a writ petition to seek closure regarding the application in Form 6 which has subsequently been allowed. The court found merit in this submission leading to the closure of the writ petition. The ruling determined the procedural legitimacy in accordance with the Land Revenue regulations.

J U D G M E N T

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, during the pendency of this writ petition, the application in Form

6 filed by the petitioner has been allowed.

In the light of the aforesaid submission, this writ petition would stand closed.

Sd/-

HARISANKAR V. MENON JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :