SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13842

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
MOHAMMEDALI V A – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 43089 OF 2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.SHIJU VARGHESE, SHRI.SACHU THOMAS
For the Respondents: DR.ABRAHAM P.MEACHINKARA, SRI. UNNIKRISHNA KAIMAL

Writ petitions aligned with prior judgments are allowed based on established legal findings.

Headnote:In this writ petition, the Court analyzed established legal principles regarding land use as previously decided in Abad Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Kerala. The facts indicate that the writ petition depends on granting directions consistent with the earlier judgment. The Court determined in favor of the petitioner in alignment with its prior findings. The petition is accordingly allowed, affirming the directives of the earlier ruling.

J U D G M E N T

The issue raised in this writ petition has already been decided against the State by the judgment of this Court in Abad Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Kerala [2025 (1) KLT 310]

In view of the above, this writ petition also stands allowed in terms of the directions contained in the aforesaid judgment.

Sd/-

HARISANKAR V. MENON JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top