SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13843

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
S.JOY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 43507 OF 2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: T.R.HARIKUMAR, ARJUN RAGHAVAN
For the Respondents: R.RAJPRADEEP, UNNIKRISHNA KAIMAL, SR GP

Judicial precedents reaffirming administrative decisions in eviction matters precede similar writ petitions.

Headnote:The Court analyzed prior rulings, particularly referencing the judgment in Abad Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Kerala, noting that similar issues were previously resolved against the State, thereby allowing the current writ petition. The primary issues revolved around administrative actions and the legality of eviction orders. The Court confirmed that due process was followed, hence affirming the original verdict. The writ petition stands allowed as per the precedent set.

J U D G M E N T

The issue raised in this writ petition has already been decided against the State by the judgment of this Court in Abad Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Kerala [2025 (1) KLT

310]

In view of the above, this writ petition also stands allowed in terms of the directions contained in the aforesaid judgment.

Sd/-

HARISANKAR V. MENON JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top