SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13844

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
NAVAMI SUDHAKAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.K.M.ANEESH, SRI.SHASHANK DEVAN, SRI.ADARSH KUMAR
For the Respondents: SRI. UNNIKRISHNA KAIMAL

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner has filed the captioned writ petition seeking to claim the benefits of the judgment of this Court in Moushmi Ann Jacob v. State of Kerala [2023 (5) KHC 339], as per which no fee required to be paid with respect to the properties upto an extent of 25 cents with reference to the provisions of Section 27A of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act , 2008.

2. However, the judgment of this Court, which was in favour of the petitioner is reversed by the Apex court in the Judgment reported as State of Kerala v. Moushmi Ann Jacob [2025 (2) KLT 26]

In the light of the afore, I find no merits in this writ petition, and the same would stand dismissed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top