Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.MATHEW JOHN (K), SRI.ABY J AUGUSTINE
For the Respondents: SRI. P.K. MANOJ KUMAR, SC.

The court upheld the dismissal of the original petition due to it not being pressed.

Headnote:The judgment examines the petitioners' submission that the original petition is not pressed. In light of this, the court dismissed the original petition as not pressed. The ruling is based on the procedural aspect of the matter.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the original petition is not pressed. This is recorded.

Accordingly, the original petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/-MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :