SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13852

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
MARY CHITTILAPPILLY – Appellant
Versus
THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 1920 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: G. HARIHARAN, PRAVEEN.H, K.S.SMITHA, B.R.SINDU, V.R.SANJEEV KUMAR, AFNA V.P., V.ROHITH
For the Respondents: SMT. DEVI SHRI R.

The court emphasized the requirement for timely decisions on requests made under motor vehicle regulations.

Headnote:The writ petition was filed seeking a mandamus for the Regional Transport Authority to consider a request for service conversion under Rule 230 of the Kerala Motor Vehicle Rules. The court noted instructions received indicating that a decision on the request would be made within three months. The court ordered the competent authority to act within the stipulated timeframe. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of.

Table of Content
1. the petitioner seeks writ for conversion of bus service. (Para 1)
2. the court acknowledges instructions for timely decision. (Para 2)
3. writ disposed with directives for action. (Para 3)

JUDGMENT

The writ petition is filed with the following prayers:-

(i) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order commanding the respondents 1 and 2 to consider and take a decision on Exhibit. P3 request seeking conversion of the service of Bus No.KL-08 AN-8907 from Limited Stop Ordinary Service (LSOS) to Ordinary service by following the procedure prescribed under Rule 230 of the Kerala Motor Vehicle Rules , within a time limit to be fixed by this Hon’ble Court;

(ii) Petitioner may be permitted to dispense with the filing of translation of the vernacular documents, And (iii) To pass such orders or reliefs as this Hon’ble Court deems fit in the interest of justice.

2. The learned Government Pleader, on instructions, that the petitioner has provided a fresh set of proposed timings, on which a feasibility report has been sought for. A decision shall be taken on the request for variation of the permit within three months. This is recorded.

3. Accordingly, the competent among the respondents will pass orders on Ext.P3, in accordance with law, within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

The Writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top