SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13855

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
MYLATHAL, SREEDHARAN, A.V.SATHEESH, CHANDRASEKHARAN C, JIJESH, RUGMINIKUTTY, U.NARAYANAN, K.BHASKARAN, SAVIN V, SAHADEVAN T, N.JALAJA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 6474 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.NIREESH MATHEW
For the Respondents: SMT. SURYA BINOY, SR. GP.

The court held that petitions become infructuous when interim orders resolve the main issues before the court.

Headnote:This writ petition challenges Ext.P1, an order passed by the District Magistrate, on grounds of non-compliance with Ext.P2 circular. Court findings led to an interim order staying Ext.P1 until its period expired. Main issue framed: Did the District Magistrate adhere to due process in Ext.P1? The court, finding no remaining issues, deemed the petition unnecessary and closed it.

Table of Content
1. challenges to administrative orders must adhere to procedural compliance. (Para 1)
2. a petition may be rendered unnecessary if interim orders resolve the key issues. (Para 2)

JUDGMENT

The writ petition is filed with the following prayers.

“i) call for the records leading to Ext.P1 and quash the same by issuing a writ of certiorari or other appropriate writ, order or direction;

ii) declare that Ext.P1 order is passed by the District Magistrate, 4th respondent without complying the directions/guidelines in Ext.P2 circular;

iii) issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the respondents not to close down toddy shops of the petitioners in Group No.II, III, IV, V, VI, XIII and XIV in Palakkad Excise Range in pursuance to Ext.P1 order on 23.02.2026 from 6 AM to 10 PM in connection with the temple Festival, ‘Pudussery Vedi of Pudusseri Sree Kurumba Bhagavathy Temple’; and iv) grant such other and further reliefs as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case”.

2. An interim order was passed by this Court on 20th February 2026 staying Ext.P1, and the period mentioned therein is already over.

Accordingly, nothing further remains to be considered in this writ petition, and the same is closed as infructuous.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top