Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRi.P.M.MOHAMMED SHIRAZ
For the Respondents: None

Writ petitions dismissed as infructuous when prayers are no longer viable.

Headnote:The relevant legal proceedings invoke the jurisdiction of the court under Article 226 of the Constitution. The court addresses the petitioners regarding the dismissal of writ applications due to the prayers being infructuous. The court finds merit in the position, leading to the request being acknowledged and the writ petitions being dismissed subsequently. The court finds that the issues at hand no longer require adjudication, warranting closure of these matters. Thus, the final decision is that the writ petitions are dismissed.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the prayers in these writ petitions have become infructuous. This is recorded.

Accordingly, these writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :