SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13865

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
ABDU RAHIMAN – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 38837 OF 2025 | OPMV NO.331 OF 2016



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: K.B. Arunkumar, Ranjit Babu, Pooja K.S., Haridas
For the Respondents: K.M. Muhammed Hussain, P.S. Appu

The court dismissed the writ petition due to failure to receive instructions from the petitioner.

Headnote:The judgment relates to a writ petition filed by the petitioner challenging prior administrative decisions. The court found no reason to pursue the case further, leading to its dismissal due to a lack of instructions. The primary issues centered around procedural compliance and parties' obligations to provide representation. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for default.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has no instruction from the petitioner. This is recorded.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for default.

Sd/-

MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.

JUDGE DMR/-

APPENDIX OF WP(C) NO. 38837 OF 2025 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS Exhibit P-1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE AWARD DATED

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top