Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13869

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
SEETHA.M. – Appellant
Versus
SUB TREASURY OFFICER – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 46596 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.P.S.BINU, SMT.K.SEENA
For the Respondents: SMT. SURYA BINOY, SR. GP., SMT. O.M. SHALINA, DSGI.

Petitioner's withdrawal leads to dismissal of writ petition.

Headnote:This judgment relates to WP

(C) No. 46596 of 2025, where the petitioner, representing an estate issue, has not pursued the writ petition, leading to a dismissal. The court acknowledges the petitioner's decision to withdraw. The primary issue framed concerns the status of the petition. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition is not pressed. This is recorded.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/-MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13869

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMMOHAMMED NIAS C.P., JSEETHA.M. – AppellantVersusSUB TREASURY OFFICER – RespondentWP(C) NO. 46596 OF 2025

Petitioner's withdrawal leads to dismissal of writ petition.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
SEETHA.M. – Appellant
Versus
SUB TREASURY OFFICER – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 46596 OF 2025