Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13878

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. KRISHNA KUMAR, J
JYOTHISH V. CHANDRA – Appellant
Versus
THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER FEDERAL BANK LIMITED – Respondent
OP(C) NO. 1115 OF 2021

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shri.N.Sasi
For the Respondents: Shri.Sunil Shanker, Smt.Vidya Gangadharan

A petition may be dismissed for non-prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear in court as required.

Headnote:The judgment relates to OP

(C) No. 1115 of 2021 concerning the dismissal of a petition due to non-prosecution. The petitioner failed to present before the court, leading to the dismissal. The court identified the key issue as the absence of representation and concluded by dismissing the petition. Final decision: The original petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

JUDGMENT

When the matter was taken up on 08.01.2026, there was no representation for the petitioner. Today also, there is no representation. Hence, the original petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13878

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMP. KRISHNA KUMAR, JJYOTHISH V. CHANDRA – AppellantVersusTHE AUTHORIZED OFFICER FEDERAL BANK LIMITED – RespondentOP(C) NO. 1115 OF 2021

A petition may be dismissed for non-prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear in court as required.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. KRISHNA KUMAR, J
JYOTHISH V. CHANDRA – Appellant
Versus
THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER FEDERAL BANK LIMITED – Respondent
OP(C) NO. 1115 OF 2021