Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13885

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. KRISHNA KUMAR, J
SAINUDHEEN – Appellant
Versus
KUNHIPOCKER – Respondent
OP(C) NO. 2098 OF 2019 | POP NO. 177 OF 2018

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.ARUN ASHOK, SRI.SHAJU XAVIER, SMT.NEENA JAMES
For the Respondents: SRI.JAMSHEED HAFIZ

A petition may be dismissed as infructuous if the underlying matter is resolved or no longer requires legal adjudication.

Headnote:This case addresses the petitioner's argument regarding the matter becoming infructuous, leading to the dismissal of the original petition. The court determined the request to be valid based on the absence of further disputes that would necessitate legal review. Consequently, the original petition was dismissed as infructuous, reflecting procedural efficiency.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, the original petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13885

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMP. KRISHNA KUMAR, JSAINUDHEEN – AppellantVersusKUNHIPOCKER – RespondentOP(C) NO. 2098 OF 2019 | POP NO. 177 OF 2018

A petition may be dismissed as infructuous if the underlying matter is resolved or no longer requires legal adjudication.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. KRISHNA KUMAR, J
SAINUDHEEN – Appellant
Versus
KUNHIPOCKER – Respondent
OP(C) NO. 2098 OF 2019 | POP NO. 177 OF 2018