Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13886

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. Krishna Kumar, J
CHANDRAMATHY – Appellant
Versus
RAVEENDRAN – Respondent
OP(C) NO. 2287 OF 2019

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.KRISHNADAS P. NAIR, SMT.K.L.SREEKALA

Original petitions can be dismissed when not actively pursued by the appellants, reflecting procedural finality.

Headnote:The petitioners filed OP

(C) No. 2287 of 2019 against proceedings in EP No. 2081/2017 in OS No. 407/2011. The court dismissed the original petition as not pressed, upholding previous lower court decisions. The core issue was whether the petitioners could pursue their objections in light of prior judgments. The Court ruled clearly on these procedural aspects, concluding that the petition was no longer viable.

JUDGMENT

Recording the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, the Original Petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/-

P. Krishna Kumar, Judge SVP PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT BEFORE THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF'S COURT, IRINJALAKKUDA DATED 7.9.2012.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13886

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMP. Krishna Kumar, JCHANDRAMATHY – AppellantVersusRAVEENDRAN – RespondentOP(C) NO. 2287 OF 2019

Original petitions can be dismissed when not actively pursued by the appellants, reflecting procedural finality.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. Krishna Kumar, J
CHANDRAMATHY – Appellant
Versus
RAVEENDRAN – Respondent
OP(C) NO. 2287 OF 2019