SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13893

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
FRANCIS – Appellant
Versus
REGINA S – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 335 OF 2026 | WP(C) NO.21257 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: K.G.CLEETUS, N.V.PAUL
For the Respondents: VIDYA KURIAKOSE

Compliance with court orders is paramount; confirmation by the government pleader led to closure of the contempt case.

Headnote:In a contempt of court case, the court analyzed compliance with the directions from a prior judgment. The petitioner submitted documents affirming the fulfillment of the court’s prior order (para 1). The primary issue addressed was whether further directions were necessary, which the court deemed unnecessary as compliance was confirmed (para 2). Consequently, the contempt case was closed based on the government pleader's submission of compliance (para 3).

JUDGMENT

Today, when the matter came up for consideration, the Government Pleader submitted that the directions in the judgment dated 12.09.2025 in WP (C) No.21257 of 2025 have already been complied. If that is the case, no further direction is necessary.

Recording the submission of the Government Pleader, this Contempt Case (C) is closed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top