Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13895

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SAJITH S – Appellant
Versus
MANOJ K – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 351 OF 2026 | WP(C) NO.24758 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.JOBY CYRIAC, SMT. GREESHMA C. THOMAS
For the Respondents: SR GP SMT VIDYA KURIAKOSE

Compliance with court directions fulfills contempt allegations.

Headnote:The judgment addresses compliance with court directions under WP

(C) No. 24758 of 2025. The court finds that the directions have been met, stating, 'no further direction is necessary' (Paragraph 1). The key issue was the implementation of previous directives. The court's reasoning confirmed the compliance of directives and thus closed the contempt case (Paragraph 1). The ruling concludes with 'this Contempt Case

(C) is closed.'

JUDGMENT

Today, when the matter came up for consideration, the Government Pleader submitted that the directions in the judgment dated 01.08.2025 in WP (C) No.24758 of 2025 have already been complied. If that is the case, no further direction is necessary.

Recording the submission of the Government Pleader, this Contempt Case (C) is closed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13895

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMP.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, JSAJITH S – AppellantVersusMANOJ K – RespondentCON.CASE(C) NO. 351 OF 2026 | WP(C) NO.24758 OF 2025

Compliance with court directions fulfills contempt allegations.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SAJITH S – Appellant
Versus
MANOJ K – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 351 OF 2026 | WP(C) NO.24758 OF 2025