IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, MR. SYAM KUMAR V.M., JJ
MR.SANTHOSH T.A – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
The present Review Petition is filed under Order XLVII Rule I read with Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure , 1908, seeking review of the judgment dated 25.08.2025 passed in WA No.1455/2020 whereby the Writ Appeal filed by the State was allowed by this Court, thereby setting aside the judgment passed by the learned Single Judge.
2. The brief facts of the case are that the Review Petitioner was the respondent in the Writ Appeal. While allowing the Writ Appeal, this Court has passed the following order:
“10. Even though the respondent might have been relieved on the same day i.e. 24.11.2018, no benefit can be extended to him since the benefit is contemplated only for those persons who were in service as on the date of that order i.e. 24.11.2018 and that the respondent continued only on the basis of the said order. Therefore, he cannot claim any benefit. In any case, the term of the respondent expired on
09.11.2016. Therefore, if the term of the substantial post itself is over, the respondent could not have been continued on the additional charge. However, he continued till fresh appointments were made, in the light of the interim order passed by this Court. Be that as it may,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.