Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, MR. SYAM KUMAR V.M., JJ
MR.SANTHOSH T.A – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. review petition context and initial claims. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. opposition to the review petition. (Para 4) |
| 3. court observations and review standards. (Para 6) |
| 4. discussion on cpc relevant provisions. (Para 7 , 9) |
| 5. clarification of review grounds and limitations. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
The present Review Petition is filed under Order XLVII Rule I read with Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure , 1908, seeking review of the judgment dated 25.08.2025 passed in WA No.1455/2020 whereby the Writ Appeal filed by the State was allowed by this Court, thereby setting aside the judgment passed by the learned Single Judge.
2. The brief facts of the case are that the Review Petitioner was the respondent in the Writ Appeal. While allowing the Writ Appeal, this Court has passed the following order:
“10. Even though the respondent might have been relieved on the same day i.e. 24.11.2018, no benefit can be extended to him since the benefit is contemplated only for those persons who were in service as on the date of that order i.e. 24.11.2018 and that the respondent continued only on the basis of the said order. Therefore, he cannot claim any benefi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
