Dismissal of a writ petition does not preclude future grievances from being presented to the Court.

Headnote:In W.P

(C) No. 9813 of 2020, the Court dismissed the writ petition as not pressed, indicating that the dismissal will not prevent the petitioner from approaching the Court again if grievances persist. The legal framework allows for re-petitioning under similar grievances despite earlier dismissal. The primary issue was whether the dismissal of the writ would bar further actions from the petitioner.

JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition is not pressed.

Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. The dismissal of the writ petition will not stand in the way of the petitioner to approach this Court again if any grievance still subsists.

Sd/-

VIJU ABRAHAM JUDGE cks APPENDIX OF WP(C) NO. 9813 OF 2020 PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE OF THE 2ND FROM THE TALUK HOSPITAL, ADIMALY TO THE PETITIONER

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13906

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMVIJU ABRAHAM, JMARIYAM BEEVI – AppellantVersusADIMALY GRAMA PANCHAYATH – RespondentWP(C) NO. 9813 OF 2020

Dismissal of a writ petition does not preclude future grievances from being presented to the Court.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
MARIYAM BEEVI – Appellant
Versus
ADIMALY GRAMA PANCHAYATH – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 9813 OF 2020