Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13915

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MRS. SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN, J
PADMINI – Appellant
Versus
MANU MOHANAN – Respondent
MACA NO. 3535 OF 2018

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.S.PRASANTH, SRI.SOORAJ T.ELENJICKAL, SRI.K.ARJUN VENUGOPAL, SMT.V.A.HARITHA, SRI.SIDHARTH B PRASAD, SHRI.R.NANDAGOPAL, KUM.GAYATHRI MURALEEDHARAN
For the Respondents: SRI.MATHEWS JACOB (SR.), SHRI.P.JACOB MATHEW

Withdrawal of an appeal is permissible under law when a valid application is presented.

Headnote:The appeal concerns the withdrawal of MACA NO. 3535 OF 2018, arising from an order of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. The appellant requested to withdraw the appeal, and the court found the request valid. The court thus dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, confirming its conclusion that withdrawal is permissible.

JUDGMENT

When this matter came up for consideration today, the learned counsel for the appellant submits that a memo dated 26.02.2026 has been produced seeking permission to withdraw the appeal.

The memo is recorded. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13915

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMMRS. SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN, JPADMINI – AppellantVersusMANU MOHANAN – RespondentMACA NO. 3535 OF 2018

Withdrawal of an appeal is permissible under law when a valid application is presented.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MRS. SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN, J
PADMINI – Appellant
Versus
MANU MOHANAN – Respondent
MACA NO. 3535 OF 2018