SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13942

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BASANT BALAJI, J
JAYARAJ – Appellant
Versus
AADHAR HOUSING FINANCE LTD. – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 6927 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.C.DHEERAJ RAJAN, SHRI.ANAND KALYANAKRISHNAN, SHRI.LIBIN VARGHESE
For the Respondents: SRI. A. SURESH, SC

A writ petition is not maintainable against a Non-Banking Financial Company as per established jurisprudence.

Headnote:This judgment concerns a writ petition for mandamus to regularize a home loan repayment. The petitioner defaulted, leading to bank proceedings under the SARFAESI Act. The Court held that as ruled in Sobha v. Muthoot Bank, a writ is not maintainable against a Non-Banking Financial Company (NBFC). Thus, the petition is dismissed while preserving the petitioner's right to approach the appropriate forum regarding the proceedings initiated against him.

Table of Content
1. loan default and bank proceedings initiation. (Para 1)
2. challenge to maintainability of writ petition against nbfc. (Para 2)
3. court's ruling on dismissal and directions for appropriate forum. (Para 3)

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 26th day of February, 2026 The petitioner had availed a home loan of Rs. 9 lakhs from the 1st respondent Bank. On account of default in repayment of the loan, the Bank initiated proceedings against the petitioner under the provisions of the SARFAESI Act . Consequent thereto, notice under Section 13(4) dated 10.10.2025 has been issued.

2. The petitioner approached this Court by filing the present writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus to regularize the loan by permitting him to remit the entire overdue amount in installments. The learned counsel for the respondents raised a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of the writ petition, contending that the respondent is a Non-Banking Financial Company (NBFC).

3. In view of the judgments of the Hon’ble Apex Court in Sobha v. Muthoot Bank ( 2025(2) KHC 229 ), wherein it has been held that a writ petition is not maintainable against an NBFC, the writ petition is disposed of leaving open the right of the petitioner to challenge the proceedings initiated against him before the appropriate forum, in accordance with law.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top