SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13949

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BASANT BALAJI, J
JETTO P.F – Appellant
Versus
THE AUTHORISED OFFICER SOUTH INDIAN BANK – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.JOHNSON JOSE PANJIKKARAN, KUM.RIMJU P.H.
For the Respondents: SHRI.SUNIL SHANKER, SHRI.MOHAN JACOB GEORGE, SMT.P.V.PARVATHY, SMT.REENA THOMAS, SMT.NIGI GEORGE

JUDGMENT

(Dated this the 26th day of February, 2026)

The reliefs sought for in this writ petition is for a direction to regularise or renew the loan account of the petitioner maintained by the respondent.

2. The learned Counsel for the respondent has made available two judgments, in which the petitioner approached this Court, one by filing W.P.(C) No.20521/2023, which was disposed of on 23/06/2023, directing the respondent to consider the proposal for One Time Settlement and to pass orders in that. Thereafter, an OP (DRT) No.347/2024 was also filed, which was disposed of permitting the petitioners granting two weeks time to exercise the right of redemption, in respect of property which was mortgaged with the respondent bank by paying the entire amount payable by them under the loan account in question.

In view of the subsequent orders passed in the above writ petition as well as the OP (DRT), the present writ petition stands closed.

Sd/-

BASANT BALAJI JUDGE

ACS

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top