SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13956

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
PRATHEESH SIMON – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON, SRI.B.DEEPAK, SHRI.MIRSHA SIDHEEK THALAPPIL
For the Respondents: SRI. RAJEEV JYOTHISH GEORGE, GP

JUDGMENT

Petitioners allege that, despite being members of the Church of South India, they are not permitted to worship at the 4th respondent Church, merely because, they married under the Special Marriage Act , 1954 instead of through the Church.

2. On a reading of the writ petition, it is evident that petitioners seek to establish a civil right which is alleged to have been infringed upon by respondents 4 to 6. There is no allegation that the State or any officer of the State, has denied any right of the petitioners. In such circumstances, the remedy, if any, available to the petitioners is to approach the Civil Court, invoking the jurisdiction under Section 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure , 1908.

3. Reserving the liberty of the petitioners to approach the appropriate forum in accordance with law, this writ petition is dismissed.

sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top