SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13966

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. JAYACHANDRAN, J
C.K.SHAJI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN, SHRI.C.N.PRAKASH
For the Respondents: ADV.VIDHYA A.C.

J U D G M E N T

Dated this the 26th day of February, 2026 The property over which the petitioners claim title has been issued with an Order under 6(2) of the Kerala Land Utilization Order , permitting user of the land for purposes other than that of agriculture. It is the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners that the property has not been included in the data bank. However, an application preferred by the petitioners in Form-A, as per the Kerala Land Tax Act , vide Ext.P7, has not been considered by the 6th respondent, is the short grievance.

2. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader, this Court directs the 6th respondent to consider Ext.P7 application in accordance with law, expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Needless to say that, the impact of the Full Bench decision of this Court in Mukthar Ali v. State of Kerala [2024 (6) KHC 187] will be considered by the

6th respondent while taking a call in Ext.P7.

The Writ Petition (Civil) will stand disposed of, as above.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top