Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. JAYACHANDRAN, J
PARAMESWARAN.L – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks fireworks display permission for festival. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court sets aside earlier refusal; conditions imposed for approval. (Para 4 , 5) |
JUDGMENT
Ext.P8 order issued by the 3rd respondent is impugned in this Writ Petition. The same refused permission to the petitioner for display of fireworks in connection with Sree Chinakkathoor Bhagavathy Temple.
2. When this matter was taken up for consideration, learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that in respect of the same temple and the same festival, permission has already been granted by virtue of the judgments produced at Exts.P11 and P12 by this Court in favour of two other Desoms. Therefore, similar treatment has to be extended to the Desom represented by the petitioner as well. Learned Counsel would submit that an Order similar to the Orders, which have been set aside in Exts.P11 and P12, has been passed in the instant case also.
3. Learned Government Pleader is an agreement with the above referred facts submitted by the learned Counsel for the petitioner.
4. In the circumstances, Ext.P8 will stand set aside. The 3rd respondent/Additional District Magistrate will stand directed to issue lice
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
