Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13978

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
ABDURAHIMAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 10533 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.NIDHI BALACHANDRAN
For the Respondents: SRI.THOMAS C.ANTONY, SMT. C.SEENA

Non-appearance of the petitioner warrants dismissal of the application for non-prosecution.

Headnote:In this judgment, the High Court of Kerala addressed the application concerning the dismissal of CRL.MC NO. 10533 of 2025 for lack of prosecution. The court found the petitioner absent, with no representation made after previous postings. The court concluded that the absence warranted dismissal. The result was that the application was dismissed for non-prosecution.

O R D E R

(Dated this the 26th day of February, 2026)

The petitioner is absent. There is no representation for the petitioner. During the previous posting date also there is no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, this Crl.MC is dismissed for non prosecution.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13978

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMC.PRATHEEP KUMAR, JABDURAHIMAN – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentCRL.MC NO. 10533 OF 2025

Non-appearance of the petitioner warrants dismissal of the application for non-prosecution.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
ABDURAHIMAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 10533 OF 2025