SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13981

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
ASHIK C.T – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 11330 OF 2025 | SC NO.1133 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.C.C.ANOOP
For the Respondents: SHRI.AFLAH C.P., SMT. MAYA.M.N

Court quashes proceedings when disputes are settled and continuing would abuse the legal process.

Headnote:The petitioner, accused in SC.No.1133/2025, filed for quashing proceedings under Section 528 of BNSS, citing settled disputes following allegations under IPC Sections 376, 376(2)(n), and 506(i). The court found the relationship consensual and decided further proceedings would be an abuse of process. The final ruling quashes all proceedings against the petitioner.

Table of Content
1. filing of a petition to quash proceedings. (Para 1 , 2)
2. representation of settled disputes. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. court's observation on the relationship being consensual. (Para 6)
4. final ruling quashing proceedings. (Para 7)

O R D E R Dated this the 26th day of February, 2026 The accused in SC.No.1133/2025 of Additional Sessions Court (Cases against Atrocities and Sexual Violence Against Women and Children), Ernakulam, arising out of Crime No.490/2024 of Njarakkal Police Station filed this petition under Section 528 of BNSS , praying for quashing all further proceedings against him. The offences alleged against the petitioners are under Section 376 , 3762(n) and 506(i) of the IPC .

2. The prosecution case is that the accused, with the intention to satisfy his sexual lust, on 12.6.2022 at about 4 p.m., committed rape upon her after promising to marry her. It is also alleged that thereafter on several days he committed rape upon her after promising to marry her and thereafter intimidated to do away with her.

3. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, now the entire dispute between the petitioner and the defato complainant has been settled.

Therefore, he prayed for quashing all further proceedings against the petitioner.

4. The learned counsel for the 3rd respondent/defacto complainant also submitted that the entire dispute between the parties were settled. The defacto complainant also filed an affidavit to that effect.

5. The petition was opposed by the learned Public prosecutor. However, upon instructions submitted that the defacto complainant had already given signed statement to the SHO in tune with the averments in the affidavit filed before this court.

6. On a perusal of the FI statement, it can be seen that the relationship between the petitioner and the defacto complainant commenced when the defacto complainant was already married to another person. Therefore, prima facie it can be seen that the relationship between them was a consensual one. Moreover, now, the entire dispute between the parties has been settled. Therefore, no useful purpose will be served in continuing the proceedings against the petitioner as the same will only be an abuse of the process of the court.

7. Therefore, this Crl.M.C. is allowed. All further proceedings against the petitioners in SC.No.1133/2025 of Additional Sessions Court (Cases against Atrocities and Sexual Violence Against Women and Children), Ernakulam, arising out of crime No.490/2024 of Njarakkal Police Station, arising out of Crime No.598/2022 of Adoor Police Station, is quashed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top