SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14002

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
SHIVAKUMAR K R – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 1704 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.RESHMA E., SMT.ASHIKA BEEGAM S.
For the Respondents: SR PP SMT SEETHA S

A vehicle linked to an offence under the Kerala Abkari Act cannot be released without a cash deposit as determined by relevant rules and case law.

Headnote:{'statute_analysis': 'The case involves Section 55(a) of the Kerala Abkari Act. Under the Kerala Abkari (Disposal of Confiscated Articles) Rules, 1996, a vehicle cannot be released without a cash deposit as interpreted in Karthikeyan v. Deputy Commissioner of Excise, Ernakulam and Another [2011(1) KLT 334] and Nikhil T.M v. Deputy Excise Commissioner, Kannur and others [2016 (4) KLT 372].', 'facts_of_the_case': 'The petitioner, the registered owner of vehicle No. KA-01-NB-9640, sought interim custody after it was seized for allegedly being used in a crime. The trial court conditionally allowed the application, requiring a deposit of Rs.7,50,000/- as security.', 'findings_of_court': "The court found no illegality in the trial court's order requiring a cash deposit prior to releasing the vehicle and dismissed the Crl.M.C.", 'issues': "The court examines whether the trial court's requirement for a cash deposit for the vehicle's release was justified.", 'ratio_decidendi': 'The court reaffirmed that a vehicle linked to an offence under the Kerala Abkari Act cannot be released without a cash deposit as per established rules and case law.', 'result': 'Crl.M.C is dismissed, but the competent authority is directed to proceed with the confiscation proceedings, in accordance with law and as expeditiously as possible.'}

Table of Content
1. owner's claim for vehicle custody (Para 1 , 2)
2. affirmation of trial court's ruling (Para 4)

ORDER

The petitioner is the registered owner of a vehicle bearing Registration No.KA-01-NB-9640, which has been seized by the Chittarikkal Police Station, Kasaragod, alleging that the accused persons in Crime No.537/2025 had used the vehicle for commission of the offence punishable under Section 55 (a) of the Kerala Abkari Act .

2. Claiming interim custody of the vehicle, the petitioner had filed an application before the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate -II, Hosdurg, (Trial Court). By Annexure A3 order, the Trial Court allowed the application but subject to conditions. As per condition No.1, the petitioner has been directed to deposit Rs.7,50,000/- as security in Court or furnish a bank guarantee for the said amount. Condition No.1 in Annexure A3 order is onerous and unjustifiable. Hence, the Crl.MC.

2. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor. 3. The learned Public Prosecutor opposes the Crl.M.C. She submits that in view of Rule 4(2)(a) of the Kerala Abkari (Disposal of Confiscated Articles) Rules, 1996 and the interpretation of the said provisions by the Division Benches of this Court in Karthikeyan v. Deputy Commissioner of Excise, Ernakulam and Another [2011(1) KLT 334] and Nikhil T.M v. Deputy Excise Commissioner, Kannur and others [2016 (4) KLT 372] , it is no longer res integra that a vehicle cannot be released without making a cash deposit. In light of the aforesaid decisions, a vehicle can be released only on the owner making a cash deposit.

4. In light of the above exposition of law, I do not find any illegality in Annexure A3 order warranting interference by this Court under Section 528 of the BNSS.

In the aforesaid circumstances, the Crl.M.C is dismissed, but the competent authority is directed to proceed with the confiscation proceedings, in accordance with law and as expeditiously as possible.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top