SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14004

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
JAYARAJAN A.V @ JAYAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 11676 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.R.B.BALACHANDRAN
For the Respondents: SRI.M.P.PRASANTH

A petitioner can withdraw a motion but retains the right to file for discharge if conditions are met.

Headnote:The petitioner seeks to withdraw the Criminal Miscellaneous Case and reserve the right to file for discharge in the Trial Court if the charge is not framed, deemed reasonable by the Court. Court accordingly dismisses the Crl.M.C. as withdrawn while directing the Trial Court to consider any subsequent application in accordance with law. The petitioner retains the option to file for discharge, provided the charge remains unframed as of the date of order. The Application for withdrawal is accepted.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS THURSDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2026 / 7TH PHALGUNA, 1947 CRL.MC NO. 11676 OF 2025 CRIME NO.268/2022 OF Chalissery Police Station, Palakkad AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN CC NO.734 OF 2022 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS , PATTAMBI PETITIONER/S:

JAYARAJAN A.V @ JAYAN AGED 63 YEARS S/O.VELAPPAN, ALATT VEEDU, GURUVAYUR WEST, CHAVAKKAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT., PIN - 680101 BY ADV SRI.R.B.BALACHANDRAN RESPONDENT/S:

1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031

2 BEENA SUNDARAN AGED 47 YEARS W/O SUNDARAN, VALIYAVALAPPIL HOUSE, CHALISSERY, PALAKKAD,, PIN - 679536 PP SRI.M.P.PRASANTH THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON

26.02.2026, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

C.S.DIAS, J.

--------------------------------------------- Crl.M.C. No. 11676 OF 2025 -----------------------------------------------

Dated this the 26th day of February, 2026 ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for sometime, seeks liberty to withdraw the Crl.M.C., by reserving the right of the petitioner to file an application for discharge before the Trial Court. I find the above submission to be reasonable and justifiable.

In the aforesaid circumstances, I dismiss the Crl.M.C. as withdrawn, but by reserving the right of the petitioner to file an application for discharge, provided the charge has not been framed till date. If such application is filed, the Trial Court is directed to consider and dispose the application, in accordance with law.

sd/-

C.S.DIAS, JUDGE rkc APPENDIX OF CRL.MC NO. 11676 OF 2025 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A1 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT LAID DOWN AS C.C.NO.734/2022 BEFORE THE JUDICIAL

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top