SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14007

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
GOPINATH P., J
ABDUL SALAM – Appellant
Versus
KODIYATHOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 1301 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.ANILKUMAR V. (VAZHARAMBIL), SHRI.BENNY THOMAS KAVALAM
For the Respondents: SHRI.SANIL CHANDRAN K.V., SRI. V.K SUNIL (GP)

Procedural compliance under cooperative society laws is crucial for valid recovery proceedings.

Headnote:The judgment involves a challenge to the recovery proceedings initiated by a bank against a petitioner for amounts due under credit facilities, focusing on procedural compliance with the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969. The court found no merit in the claim of non-compliance as no certificate from the Registrar was required for the execution involved. The petitioner was given a chance to repay the total amount in instalments, hence allowing some relief against impending coercive actions.

Table of Content
1. challenge to recovery proceedings initiated by bank. (Para 1)
2. non-compliance with cooperative society laws. (Para 2)
3. repayment plan approved by court. (Para 4 , 5)
4. disposal of writ petition with direction to bank. (Para 6)

JUDGMENT

This writ petition has been filed challenging the recovery proceedings initiated by the respondent bank to recover amounts due under credit facilities availed by the petitioner from the respondent bank.

2. The petitioner approached this Court taking up a specific contention that no certificate as contemplated by the provisions of Section 76 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act , 1969 had been obtained from the Registrar of Co-operative Societies before the execution proceedings were initiated. Considering this contention and having regard to the statutory provisions, this Court on 15.01.2026 passed the following order:-

‘’Admit.

2. Issue notice by speed post to the first respondent. Notice to the second respondent is dispensed with for the time being. The learned Government Pleader accepts notice for the third and fourth respondents. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.

4. Prima facie, I am not convinced that there is any merit in the contention taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the award has been passed by an incompetent officer. Further, the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that no certificate has been drawn up before the execution proceedings does not, prima facie, merit consideration, as a certificate has to be obtained only for execution of the award through a civil court and insofar as execution through an officer empowered by the Registrar is concerned, such empowerment may be through general or special order. Therefore, at present, I am not inclined to stay the further proceedings against the petitioner.

Post on 02.02.2026.’’

3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent bank submits that if the petitioner were to pay Rs.10,00,000/- towards the loan liability on or before 31.03.2026, the petitioner can be permitted to clear the balance liability in instalments. It is also submitted that the outstanding amount, as on 26.02.2026, is Rs.68,99,674/- (Rupees Sixty eight lakhs ninety nine thousand six hundred and seventy four only).

4. Today when the matter is taken up for consideration, it is the submission of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the petitioner may be permitted to clear the liability in instalments and all other contentions are not pressed. It is submitted that the petitioner is willing to remit a substantial amount towards the loan liability immediately.

5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made as recorded above, I am of the view that the petitioner can be granted an opportunity to repay the outstanding amount in twelve instalments provided a substantial amount is paid on or before 31.03.2026.

6. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the respondent bank to accept repayment of the entire outstanding amount of Rs.68,99,674/- (Rupees Sixty eight lakhs ninety nine thousand six hundred and seventy four only) along with accrued interest, costs and bank charges from the petitioner in the following manner:

(i) The petitioner shall pay a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten lakhs only) on or before 31.03.2026;

(ii) The balance outstanding amount of Rs.58,99,674/- (Rupees Fifty eight lakhs ninety nine thousand six hundred and seventy four only) shall be repaid in twelve equated monthly instalments along with any accrued interest, costs and charges;

(iii) The first instalment shall be paid on or before 30.04.2026 and the subsequent instalments shall be paid on or before the last working day of the succeeding months;

(iv) In the event of default of any one instalment, the respondent bank shall be entitled to proceed in accordance with the law;

(v) In order to enable the petitioner to repay the entire amounts as above, all coe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top